Marsden, William. Stupid to
the Last Drop: How Alberta is Bringing Environmental Armageddon to
Canada (And Doesn't Seem to Care). Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf
Canada. 2007
With the rapid developments in the energy
economy in the world these days, a book like Marsden's—published
in 2007—seems almost . . . old.
No mention here of the great pipeline discussions—Keystone,
Northern Gateway, Kinder-Morgan—currently
in the daily news.
The developments that brought us to this point, however, are summarized here, from Manley Natland's 1950s dream of extracting oil sands oil by detonating nuclear explosions underground to the current (at least to 2007) reality that is the great Alberta oil sands project. We're a country in a schizophrenic bind; addicted to fossil fuel energy and demanding the privileges of driving, flying, effortless home heating and cooling, we are nevertheless fearful of what our appetites are doing to the future of our world. Marsden gives us plenty of reasons for apprehension.
The history of the
Athabasca oil sands doesn't begin with Natland's bizarre proposal. In
1788, Alexander MacKenzie wrote in his log: "At about 24
miles (39 km) from the fork (of the Athabasca and Clearwater
Rivers) are some bituminous fountains into which a pole of 20 feet
(6.1 m) long may be inserted without the least resistance. The
bitumen is in a fluid state and when mixed with gum, the resinous
substance collected from the spruce
fir, it serves to gum the Indians' canoes."i
Although probably not as an energy source, the knowledge of and the
utilization of the unique "tar" under the boreal forest of
northeastern Alberta goes back thousands of years.
The era of fossil fuel energy use began only
recently as geological historians measure time. Marsden traces the
birth of the petroleum industry back to Black Creek—later
Oil Springs, today the town of Petrolia—Ontario
in 1858 where James Miller Williams discovered oil while digging a
well. Since whale oil supplies were dwindling and Abraham Gesner had
already developed a way of distilling oil to make kerosene, Williams
saw an opportunity and the rush to harvest underground oil was on.
The industry boomed, land was stripped, the first oil spill
contaminated Lake St. Clair and the rest, as the saying goes, is
history.
But Marsden focuses on Alberta, whose reserves
of conventional plus unconventional oil stocks rival and surpass
those of Saudi Arabia. It's in Alberta that the drama of fossil
fuels' final hiccup will likely be played out in Canada. The ability
to extract oil economically worldwide has peaked and the oil sands of
Alberta are becoming ever more attractive (along with the momentary
benefits of fracking) to that part of the world economy that is
founded on the profitability of petroleum:
Each year will bring a greater chance of
chaos as oil and gas prices rise and nations begin to fight over
what's left. Economies will slow and the collapse; refineries will
become fortresses; armies will march, nation against nation,
neighbour against neighbour, as we fight over every last puddle of
fossil fuel. As we enter the downward curve on the oil reserve chart,
the conflict will intensify (48).
This scenario accounts for the "Armageddon"
in Marsden's title, I suppose. The possibility of an end-
of-fossil-fuels apocalypse, however, should at least give us pause
enough to move us toward rigorously developing alternative scenarios.
(I'm reminded of Mark Twain's defense of bad habits involving alcohol
and tobacco, etc. by cautioning that to come to approaching death
with nothing to give up would be like a sinking ship with no freight
to throw overboard.)ii
But if Marsden is our guide on this subject,
the future for Albertans is bleak. Syncrude, Suncor, Shell Canada
continue to apply for permission to expand and license to do so is
almost automatic; the Alberta government throughout has been in the
pockets of big oil, Marsden contends, and despite the massive profits
taken by oil companies, Albertans share of the harvest of their own
resource has been pitifully small. And it doesn't end there.
There are two ways to harvest oil sands oil: open pit and in situ, the latter involving separating the oil below ground and pumping it up. The surface mining of the oil creates an environmental mess that can be seen from the moon, apparently, and for which no certain reclamation method has been proven. Marsden takes us on a journey down the river from Fort McMurray to Lake Athabasca and chronicles some of the (unproven) health-related effects of the chemicals finding their way into the Athabasca River, Lake Athabasca and potentially, the MacKenzie River system. Both in the fracturing of formations to release remnant pockets of oil not previously accessible and in the oil sands separation processes, chemicals known to be dangerous to health are required and this represents one of the 'unknown unknowns' that is worrisome to anyone concerned about the future of the province's population.
There are two ways to harvest oil sands oil: open pit and in situ, the latter involving separating the oil below ground and pumping it up. The surface mining of the oil creates an environmental mess that can be seen from the moon, apparently, and for which no certain reclamation method has been proven. Marsden takes us on a journey down the river from Fort McMurray to Lake Athabasca and chronicles some of the (unproven) health-related effects of the chemicals finding their way into the Athabasca River, Lake Athabasca and potentially, the MacKenzie River system. Both in the fracturing of formations to release remnant pockets of oil not previously accessible and in the oil sands separation processes, chemicals known to be dangerous to health are required and this represents one of the 'unknown unknowns' that is worrisome to anyone concerned about the future of the province's population.
I remember a news story about a woman near
Rosebud, Alberta lighting the gases that came out of her faucet.
Marsden visits families affected (apparently) by the material
released in the fracking of coal beds in order to mine methane gas
found in abundance in all such deposits. Thousands of such wells are
projected to be developed in Alberta and evidence is that this cannot
happen without the accidental or incidental release of amounts of
methane gas. Oil companies have had to haul water supplies to
residents in areas affected, in fact acknowledging that such mining
of methane can contaminate wells as well as surface water. For
ranchers like Francis Gardener in Happy Valley, the effects of oil
industry encroachment looks a lot like the end of a way of life. With
contamination of scarce water supplies, physical infrastructure for
oil and gas extraction all over the formerly-pristine expanses of
native fescue, the bell seems to be tolling for traditional rural
life in southern Alberta.
All this may sound alarmist, but is it alarmist beyond reason? In Canada today, the debate about pipelines, oil sands and climate change is indication, surely, that we're beginning to see that the future can't be a facsimile of the past. The Harper government continues to pave the way for the oil extraction industry while watering down environmental regulation and we're quickly dividing ourselves into two antagonistic camps. Objections by aboriginal people whose life-ways are directly affected by the governments' disregard of treaty obligations starkly outline the parameters of the differences. Harper's comments routinely reflect a body of opinion that says that climate change mitigation must never cost the economy:
Recently
prime minister Stephen Harper publicly
criticized a polluter pay solution
to growing emissions, saying no country would undertake climate
action that might harm the economy. Onlookers were quick to critique
Harper's economy versus environment framing, an outmoded way of
viewing the transition to clean energy, a
rapidly
growing sector of the global economy.iii
There's a great
deal of denial going on; the oil sands being just another example of
shitting on the dining room table and claiming that its really good
for all of us.
Marsden is an
investigative reporter for the Montreal Gazette and his credentials
for the writing of Stupid to
the Last Drop are impeccable.
What I found most compelling was his on-the-ground research for the
book; he introduces us to an assortment of Albertans directly
affected by the subject matter. Augmenting this first-person approach
is his extensive research into the nitty-gritty of oil-field
politics: the takeovers, the manipulation of government and
regulatory agencies, the denial of responsibility when things go
wrong and, above all, the details of the enormous profit taking that
has characterized the Alberta oil scene from Leduc to the present,
and which likely means any fight by the Canadian public to seriously begin kicking the destructive fossil fuel habit will meet with massive resistance.
i
"Oil
Sands History". Unlocking the Potential of the Oil
Sands. Syncrude. 2006. Retrieved by Wikipedia in 2008-02-17;
Retrieved from Wikipedia 2014-11-20
ii
http://riverroadrambler.blogspot.ca/2012/11/mark-twain-on-bad-habits.html.
Retrieved 2014-11-29
iii
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/carol-linnitt/harper-climate-pr_b_5883740.html.
Retrieved 2014-11-29
Apologies for the formatting on this. Don't know why this happened.
ReplyDelete